Some of the things we’ve built.

Your procedures, contracts, records, past correspondence and notes are prepared so the system can search them by meaning, not only by exact words. Ask a question or set a task, and it finds the relevant passages and writes from them, pointing back to each source.

Your team stops hunting through folders, shared drives and old inboxes for something somebody already wrote down. The answer arrives with its source attached, so it can be checked rather than trusted. When the answer is not in your records, a system built properly says so.

It is only as good as the records you give it. Feed it procedures that are three years out of date and it will quote them with complete confidence. Someone has to decide what goes in, keep it current, and set who may see what.

Ongoing but small: storage for the indexed records, plus a usage charge per question. The effort sits at the front, in choosing and preparing the material.

A system built for your process: your records, your steps, and a view for each role, signed in with the accounts your team already has. Inside it, AI can be given tools to do a task, such as reading a document, sorting a transaction into the right account or filing a record, and a person checks and approves what it did.

The work lives in one place instead of a spreadsheet per person, and an update made once reaches everyone who needs it. Repetitive handling becomes a review rather than a keyboard job.

Hosting, in your own cloud account or on a platform we run for you, and a small charge per document or transaction where AI does the handling. There is no seat licence to buy for people who barely touch it.

One agent drafts. One checks the draft against your rules. One files it and tells the person who needs to know. Runs can be logged, so you can see what ran, what it used and what it decided, and a person sits at the approval points you choose.

It suits work with many steps, across several systems, that only one person knows end to end. The sequence is written down and run the same way every time, so it no longer falls over when that person is on leave.

This is the most involved of the five and the easiest to get wrong. It only makes sense once the process itself is stable, because automating a broken process repeats its mistakes.

The most of the five, because several models work on every job and a person still spends time approving. It pays its way on high volume repeatable work and rarely anywhere else. We will tell you which you have.

Your voice, your claims and your rules are written down once, in a form the system can check against. Briefs go in one end. Drafts come out the other, already checked, for a person to edit and approve before anything is sent.

Marketing stops depending on who has a spare afternoon. What goes out sounds the same whoever produced it, and it goes to the right people, because the list rules are written down too.

A usage charge per piece or per send, plus the time of the person who edits and approves it.